It feels as though I have gotten a snow cone off the tip of
an iceberg in terms of the knowledge and experience that come with this guy, Francois, my friend Jane's teacher, who traveled to California from his base in Rochetser, New York to give a two-day workshop at the Healdsburg Yoga Studio. He
has such a long history of practice and closeness to the source, and remains an
ardent seeker. Francois strikes me as a healer first and foremost. He wants
people to treat their bodies with kindness and he knows how to teach them that.
He is not interested in asana for its own sake.
The theme of the weekend was sitting and standing, with a
subtitle that could have been "regressing to progress". There was a
slideshow to contrast modern-people/bad
posture with people-who-live-close-to-the-earth/good posture, hence “regress to
progress”. Go back to folk ways of natural tadasana spine upon which to build
the refinement of asana.
It was a luxury to have only 13 people in the workshop because he treated the
sessions more like classes with no fixed agenda, and he improvised quite a bit.
Someone requested we work on pincha so we did. He changed his plan for seated
poses when he found out we were a room full of bad knees. Coming back to the
simplicity and universality of tadasana was the common thread.
He loves to talk. And he's a bit of a clown, sometimes in a
sophisticated way and sometimes in a way that almost makes me understand why
the French like Jerry Lewis. He was like a little kid describing the Allard
workshop he had recently attended, and gleefully referred back to it many times
over the weekend when anatomy would come up.
One analogy he made will stay with me. He said that asana is a way of damming
up prana in the body, and releasing the dam allows the benefits of prana to be
felt.
There was a lot of philosophy that happened along: Patanjali
as a renunciate vs. BKS as a moderate....folks who have fled confining
religions but glom onto the yamas and niyamas in their most rigid form because
they are familiar territory....tofu vs. tantra.
The nuts and bolts of the asana instruction were strict but forgiving, and the
exacting detail was a feast for me. He offered modifications for one woman with
scoliosis, another with a knee that wouldn't bend past 90 degrees, and for the
restoratives he enjoyed facilitating comfort with a blanket here, a bolster
there, etc, etc.
He fixed my godawful revolved triangle so that I don't hate
it anymore.
As I told Jane, I really do sit up nights worrying what is
going to happen when BKS dies. I know there are many great Iyengar teachers
around, but without the ability to witness first hand the tremendous humanity
beneath Iyengar’s seemingly harsh exterior, my worry is that practitioners will
drift away from the structure, throwing out the baby with the bath water.
After meeting Francois, I have to say I will worry less, because Francois (and
I hope there are others) has that same combination of insistence on form and
structure along with an underlying humanity that is his true and most profound
nature. When Francois talks about BKS he does so with such love and reverence,
but without placing BKS on any kind of pedestal, and really, when you love
someone that much as a human being it is more meaningful than the kind of blind
worship gurus are offered by students yearning for more than any fellow human
can give.
terrific and inspiring report, Ann!
I just thought I'd throw in this link to the open sky site:
http://www.openskyyoga.com/
Your experience sounds wonderful, on many levels.
Posted by: sophie | March 24, 2006 at 12:33 PM
Your text is well reflecting the spirit of my teaching and I thank you for that. To see layers is a sign of a mature practice and clarity of perception. Just few points I would like to clarify:
1 Sometimes words like guys and folks are too casual in the context of yoga for describing students and teachers. Same when a waitress or a sales rep call you honey !
2 "Regress then progress" is more a concept for going back to a beginning stage of an asana, tracing the dysfunction, re-pattern and then progress again on a new path, free of habits or conditioning. Or going back to Savasana, release the nervous system then rebuild from there. Going back to silence before creating a sound. Natural breath before starting Ujjayi Pranayama, playing. Too many people block themselves by going too far, too soon. They are playing the same movie, just faster or louder! Same in psycho-therapy where regression is often needed to clear up old wounds or past karmas. Then true progress can be made. I didn’t refer to a golden age or that we have to let go of technology (like communicating though the Yogalila website for example!) or civilization. Just saying that we can still witness traditional cultures and learn from them in terms of integrity of posture (Tadasana especially), contentment and ergonomics in a working context (sitting, bending forward, carrying).
3 I don’t think minimal toning is optimal. Strength and stamina are needed. I think a lot of people need to release first by stretching, deep relaxation, restorative practice, then can tone where there is weakness. Toning on tension is not optimal. In fact that is what creates a high level of pathology in sports or dance. Pushing without seeing. Yoga always searches for the best saving energy plan and effortless effort (a paradox you have to resolve!)
4 When B.K.S. Iyengar dies, he will live though his legacy and though us by the seeds he planted in our hearts. look at the legacy of Mozart or Einstein....That is how I see reincarnation. That is why great traditions stay alive. They just adapt to the times and change manifestations or names but the essence is.
Namaste.
Francois Raoult.
Posted by: Francois Raoult | March 25, 2006 at 04:24 PM